Comments on: League Vote : Cunnigham Vs. Hairston

By: King4Life

King4Life — Mon, 18 Jan 2010 19:05:35 +0000

Chris why dont you understand the basic rule here? If one of the owners has a problem with Commish decision THEN it goes to a vote and then only.

Sot — Mon, 18 Jan 2010 17:00:17 +0000

This vote should have never taken place. You are in agreement that cunningham should be awarded to Tillman. No need for a vote.

Richie — Mon, 18 Jan 2010 16:35:55 +0000

TRC-B

Soxin7 — Mon, 18 Jan 2010 16:34:13 +0000

prospecttube — Mon, 18 Jan 2010 16:16:15 +0000

Why would this vote be over? It’s a league vote, and not everyone has the same philosophy on minor leaguers, EE being one of them.

TUSA — Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:08:31 +0000

Ill agree with Rotoworld and MLBTR on this matter, B.

JM — Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:46:30 +0000

Evil Empire — Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:34:28 +0000

EE Votes A

Sot — Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:34:14 +0000

This vote is over. If WTNY is in agreement with the commish decision, there there is no need for a vote.

Tillman awarded first pick in the deal.

WTNY — Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:57:35 +0000

WTNY Votes B.